oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Oct 16, 2006 16:29:37 GMT -5
"EXCLUSIVE" "CKBW RADIO INTERVIEW" Sheldon MacLeod: The Sunday Morning Show Interviews with Keith Ranville about the Oak Island treasure mystery. Listen to it at--> kr.mendhak.comMP3 at the bottom of the page FIRST NATIONS Researcher/ Treasure Hunter Keith Ranville kr.mendhak.com
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Feb 13, 2007 3:44:32 GMT -5
OAK ISLAND TREASURE MYSTERY WATERMARK CIPHER New: Oak Island Secret Treasure Cipher Recently Mr. Ranville made it known of a translation of a watermark cipher that he broken down from top to bottom descriptively, while Mr. Ranville was investigating the Oak Island treasure mystery’ he came across a watermark in a book the Oak Island Mystery by the Fanthorpes. The theory of Sir Francis Bacon and his relation to Oak Island is not relatively new, many books on Oak Island mention Sir Francis Bacon as contender of who? As a possible suspect that he may have involvement in the Oak Island treasure mystery that is now in it’s 212th year of many searches for the trophy treasure that past treasure hunters failed to grasp. Perhaps with more advanced treasure-hunting equipment and exploring Mr. Ranville’s Oak islands research concepts will give us a better understanding of this enigma. It is said Sir Francis Bacons personal writings were and preserved in mercury and hidden some where in the Oak Island treasure mystery?Keith Ranville a Canadian First Nations Native, is known for his translation’s of the Oak Island Money pit symbols, and for his newly discovery the Birch Island triangle. Mr. Ranville explains his theory in diagrams: www.treasurestories.losttreasurehunting.com/2007/02/13/oak-island-treasure-mystery-watermark-cipher/
|
|
|
Post by Rebel KGC on Feb 13, 2007 15:30:24 GMT -5
Yo! Rebel here: ;D MORE on "Water-marks/Ciphers"...FRANCIS BACON AND HIS SECRET SOCIETY by Annie Potts...
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Mar 3, 2007 4:49:26 GMT -5
OAK ISLAND FEATURE FILM DOCUMENTARY EXCLUSIVE New National Treasure Hunter Frank W. Pandozzi Production, LLC 506 Valley Drive East Suite 101 Chittenango, New York 13037 315-*** **** detector99@yahoo.com For more information: Frank W. Pandozzi Frank W. Pandozzi Productions, LLC 315-*** **** 315-*** **** (cell phone) detector99@yahoo.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 1, 2007 Legendary Treasure Story To Be Filmed Chittenango, NY – Frank W. Pandozzi Production, LLC the producer of Exploring Historys Treasures TV series, has received the exclusive rights to film the Oak Island treasure story. Ryan Prucker of Imagelight Advertising & Production, LLC will be the co-producer. For centuries the treasure on Oak Island, Nova Scotia has been a mystery to treasure hunters, historians, and adventure seekers. “The Oak Island treasure has been as puzzling as any treasure story in the world. What is buried on Oak Island and where it is buried has received interest for more than two centuries. Some say the “Holy Grail” the cup that Jesus drank from at the “Last Supper” is buried on the Island. Others have speculated that the treasure may very well be a book or a letter that could significantly affect the world today. Whatever is buried on Oak Island may now be located based on a new interpretation of a centuries old clue. The clue could lead to what the treasure is and it’s whereabouts,” Pandozzi states. The Oak Island treasure legend began in the summer of 1795. Three individuals, Daniel McGinnis, John Smith and Anthony Vaughn were adventuring on Oak Island when they discovered a spot on the ground that looked as if it had been recently uncovered. Fifteen feet above the ground, swung a ships tackle hanging from a sawed off tree branch. On the tree were carved strange markings. Visions of a buried treasure danced in their heads, so the three kept digging. Digging deeper a former oak Island company encountered a flagstone with a strange inscription scrawled into it. It is this mysterious cipher that has captivated the world of treasure hunters. No one has been able to establish what the code means. However, Keith Ranville, a Canadian Cree Native Indian, has studied the clues and believes he knows where the treasure is buried. “Keith Ranville has worked diligently to uncover the mystery behind the code. I believe he is on to something,” Pandozzi says. Filming will begin sometime this year. Frank W. Pandozzi Production, LLC in Chittenango New York started operations in 2005.The production company produces Exploring Historys Treasures Television series and DVDs. The series features history, metal detecting and treasure hunting. Imagelight Advertising & Production, LLC in Syracuse New York is the co-producer of Exploring Historys Treasures TV series. Imagelight also provides full-scale film production, editing, media buying services as well as advertising to businesses and corporations. Interested parties may visit www.Imagel.netFor more information please visit www.exploringhistorystreasures.com, or www.metal-detecting-ghost-towns-of-the-east.com. Frank W. Pandozzi detector99@yahoo.com # # # New Leading Research: Oak Island Treasure Hunter/Researcher Keith Ranville
|
|
|
Post by Rebel KGC on Mar 3, 2007 8:36:19 GMT -5
Yo! Rebel here: ;D Keith, sounds good... will get DVD, when it is available... I think that Knight Templars/Pirates made "contact" with native Canadians up there (Cree), and with K.T. "building skills", consructed "The Pit" to bury stuff from King Solomon's Temple, stuff from the "High Seas", and MAYBE Jesuit stuff... any Knight Templars/Pirates swords found up there, yet? (sunny out...).
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Mar 7, 2007 4:38:38 GMT -5
Hi Rebel KGC Sounds like you wraped up the whole treasure mystery in one swooping breath, Lol' treasure hunting should be fun' and I injoy your spirit, on this whole treasure hunting subject; no swords found yet. just a little cloak and dagger going on'. with people tailing around the web. take it easy bro' keith, kr.mendhak.com
|
|
|
Post by TemplarScribe on Mar 7, 2007 14:14:52 GMT -5
Well, Keith, we meet again! Say, if you have a moment in the midst of your hectic schedule, I have some pertinent questions for you. Since you claim to be the leading Oak Island researcher, these should be a cinch for you. Ten Questions For Keith Ranville:1. When you show your picture of Birch Island superimposed with the triangle of dots (similar to the stone triangle on Oak Island), have you made it clear there are no boulders or stones on Birch Island representing these positions? 2. When you claim that the "triangle" on Birch Island is man-made, have you made it clear that from aerial images, there are obvious indications of wetland features, such as streams, emergent vegetation (plants that exist in a partially wet-partially dry environment) and natural springs? 3. Have you addressed the fact that such plant growth as mentioned above exhibits extreme change over the short time interval of twenty to thirty years between when the black-and-white images were taken and when the color images were taken? 4. Have you considered the possibility that if such environmental change (like shifting shorelines, missing trees and drying wetlands) could occur in such a short timeframe (possibly as little as thirty years or so), how difficult it would be for a supposedly "man-made" feature to still be visible after three hundred and fifty years? 5. When you suggest that native tribes are responsible for the placement of the Inscribed Stone ninety feet below ground, had also dug a mile-and-a-half long tunnel between Oak Island and Birch Island, and placed underwater doors on Birch Island, have you any evidence of such below ground work done anywhere else by the same native tribes? 6. Have you explained the difficulty of excavating a mile-and-a-half long tunnel completely underwater from Oak Island to Birch Island, the difficulty of getting fresh air to the miners, and where the spoils from such an excavation would have been placed? 7. If, as you suggest, that the Money Pit (where the Inscribed Stone was found) was never meant to go below the depth where the Stone was found (around ninety feet), then what was the purpose of the concrete vault some twenty feet further down containing oak and metal pieces, evidence of which was brought up by hand augur in the 1800s? 8. If, as you suggest, the ninety foot level was as far as the excavators meant to go, then why is there evidence of man-made activity below bedrock at two hundred feet, as evidenced by video and iron brought up from Borehole 10-X, some sixty feet distance from the Money Pit? 9. If, as you suggest, there was no need to go below ninety feet, then why were there (at least) two separate self-contained drainage systems leading into the Money Pit below the hundred foot level, whose terminus were false beaches lined with coconut fiber, material that is not native to Nova Scotia? 10. When you claim that Francis Bacon was a Freemason, have you taken into account that there is no evidence of any English Masonic body before 1717, more than ninety years after Bacon passed away? There are a couple dozen more questions I'd love to have Keith answer. But as will soon be seen, whenever anyone brings up such inconvenient questions, pointing out the glaring holes in Keith's research, he responds with personal attacks, more spam press releases, or the current retort of choice, placing his fingers in his ears and yelling "Nyah nyah, can't hear you, you're on the ignore list!" And if anyone seriously wants to help Keith in his adventure with reality, perhaps you might ask some hard-hitting questions before he embarrasses himself on videotape for all the world to see. Or, if you merely want to participate in his personal fan club without holding him to account for his theories, then by all means, let him claim whatever he wants without accountability. I would respectfully suggest, however, that's not the way true research is done. TemplarScribe www.eternalhorizons.comwww.michaeldelving.com
|
|
|
Post by TemplarScribe on Mar 8, 2007 5:46:20 GMT -5
oakster, TemplarScribe, Your last post, I will leave it mostly because you raise some well thought out questions that should be addressed. But, as for your posting other links to other forums where you two were name calling---- it has been deleted. Fair enough, Beale. I thank you for allowing an intelligent debate to spring up here. I sincerely hope these questions may be answered in time, if not by Mr. Ranville, then by someone else. If anyone has any other questions regarding Oak Island (or other mysteries), I'll do my best to answer them in an open, straightforward fashion. TS
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Mar 9, 2007 6:36:21 GMT -5
Oak Island Reveals it's Secrets March 9, 2007 It is I, keith Ranville’ Oak Island’s leading treasure hunter; up to now’ I have been receiving considerable amount of attention for my discoveries, concerning the Oak Island treasure mystery evidence brought forward as clues that was not fully understood up to now. Pay NO attention to scrupulous people portraying they know me? Here are some of there opening statements; keith old chap or I know keith , ect.. These People are opportunists that are trying to cash in or hitch a ride on my growing treasure hunting notoriety for my discoveries without them having any such notoriety for themselves, to display nor they have a recognized reputable treasure hunter background, to comment on’ in regards of my research, that they have no involvement in or they do not have a full understanding of any of my research concepts. At this time I am involved in a project regarding an Oak Island Documentary, that I will be showcasing adventurous treasure hunting footage and all my new research discoveries and new information that will be explained in full explanation in the documentary. I give thanks to websites that host my logical research and the theories that arise from it, from the hard work I made into adventure, that caught the eye of websites that venue’s information and entertains peoples curiosities. The supportive people of me will have a noticeable Canadian Heritage involvement, on any out come of this Oak Island legendary historical venture. Oak Island treasure mystery is mystic place that has many avenues of clues that can lead to many places, there is a right path and I am on it’ and I invite the world on my quest in to discovery, that will be taking departure for a scheduled “voyage” so all can a board on the release date of my documentary when announced. Film Documentary information www.treasurestories.losttreasurehunting.com/2007/03/02/legendary-treasure-story-to-be-filmed-oak-island-treasure/kr-mendhak-com.bloghi.com/2007/03/01/oak-island-feature-documentary-film-exclusive-keith-ranville.htmlSincerely Oak Island’s Leading researcher Canadian Cree First Nations & Sinclair Heritage Keith Ranville kr.mendhak.com www.mythandmystery.com/sir_francis_bacon_oak_island_connection.htm www.treasurestories.losttreasurehunting.com/2007/02/13/oak-island-treasure-mystery-watermark-cipher/
|
|
Corey CrockerDesjarlais
Guest
|
Post by Corey CrockerDesjarlais on Mar 9, 2007 20:24:25 GMT -5
I have to say what I've read here in such a manner of description to down foldin, or giving someone your own point of view. Its one thing to be able to understand circumstances and interest involved. My name is Corey Crocker/Desjarlais; I am an advent member of archivial society founded in 1897. Through these archives and testimonials you find a distint trend on the history of Oak Island, I found it very interesting of the energy put into the scope of this project without prevail; I also like to note that I have read what, 'Keith Ranville' Theories, and the scope of his studies, and research; I found it to be very interesting in such a 180 degree turn on something researches were not able to accomplish to this day. I say to the individuals that obviously soaked a lot of energy into interpetation of Oak Isand as a little blind sided; I can see the downplay of Keith Ranville and his interpetation on the scenerio. Now first off lets say if you are closed to his efforts the one sided interpetation only leaves room for default. I have to say that I truly believe Keith Ranville has brought something to the table that deserves attention that I'm sure he will end up getting at the end. One thing to psyco; or such a descriptive name I believe your name is all you need to describe your own thoughts and expressions. I see that you have soaked a lot into this, and for the point you must have so much soaked into the whole scope of things; and really I dont have the energy to tell you all why would you downplay a theory; to me your talking about the respect integurity of a situation; that is now what it is; a situation. To tell little of what people found so far on Oak Island, and the losses, and turmoil that was derived from maybe looking in the wrong spot. I say inconclusion to the illicit knowledge I have read about it; you keep doing what you are doing Mr. Keith Ranville; I have to say I do truly believe you are onto something more than as enforen states a scam to weasal peoples money, because we're all sure that we have lets say multi-million dollar investors that are going to thwart their money towards something they don't put proper investagation in it themselves; c'mon; lets think before we so easily state and downplay something, because I'm sure you all have enough to invest with Keiths ventures, and Im sure those that do have enough money would not be sitting in here with the likes of ppl that downplay ppls theories for a liken of feeling intellectual; and to the individual using the term, 'ol chap', in a sense of trying to sound like something you are obviously not. Let's try to keep an open mind about something I have learned that a certian individual gave up lots to accomplish. I wouldn't be so quick to downplay such an admiral cause.
Respectfully Corey Crocker/Desjarlais
|
|
Corey CrockerDesjarlais
Guest
|
Post by Corey CrockerDesjarlais on Mar 9, 2007 21:48:51 GMT -5
First off to Templarscribe; lets begin something as distinct as such as well thought out questions put forth to hence put a sway in the way Mr.Keith Ranville is conducting his research; hmmm, now obviously you must have something to gain other than personal acquirement. Now before I keep going I have to say I find it interesting the audacious counter-productive calamity that is and seems to me to be one-sided. So I say I will put lets say my two-cents in; for the sake's of, 'I don't appretiate such malevolence in terms of endearment,' and I hold an appretialtive interest in the above tribulations. Now I have to say some of the questions are not questions but more stipulations. So just to put it foward and maybe add onto it later I will go through it. 1). When you show your picture of Birch Island superimposed with the triangle of dots (similar to the stone triangle on Oak Island), have you made it clear there are no boulders or stones on Birch Island representing these positions? -I mean because there are superimposed triangle of dots, I mean common sense should come into play here; when I looked at these so-called dots I didnt expect to have seen the same rocks as oak island; that would make everythin a little too easy dont you think. I mean were dealing with one of Canada's oldest treasure's; lets hope it's not that easy. 2)When you claim that the "triangle" on Birch Island is man-made, have you made it clear that from aerial images, there are obvious indications of wetland features, such as streams, emergent vegetation (plants that exist in a partially wet-partially dry environment) and natural springs? -I study Water Shed's and Surface Water Hydrology; and lets say because something is man-made doesn't stop the quick one way flow of where water is going to end up, such as a stream taking the most imperveous route; I don't really get what your getting at, in this questions are you simply making an observation; or an educated query; or whatever it may be. Let's just say that even when it is man-made does not stop the fact that eventually natural growth frow surrounding pollunization, and the extremeties of water;hehe. 3)Have you addressed the fact that such plant growth as mentioned above exhibits extreme change over the short time interval of twenty to thirty years between when the black-and-white images were taken and when the color images were taken? -Too address change in enviroment such that lets say plant growth as mentioned in the above to extreme changes in what it would be rate of growth; I don't really think within the very-short time frame compared to topological change, and variations in geographical change; really I don't see it making that much of a difference. 4)Have you considered the possibility that if such environmental change (like shifting shorelines, missing trees and drying wetlands) could occur in such a short timeframe (possibly as little as thirty years or so), how difficult it would be for a supposedly "man-made" feature to still be visible after three hundred and fifty years? -I think of we realize how many man-made structures, and changes made by man; well this would be pretty small in the whole scope of things. Like I said before such changes in pressures, temperatures-maybe 2 degree's within a hundred years; I mean this is very possible, not just possible has happened. It's not hard to believe that three-hundred and fifty years; which I thought the treasure was 215 years old or so...but anyway it's not just possible; it has happened in a lot of places through civilization. Even over a larger scope than 350 years; woooo...like really this is nothing compared to time-frames. 5)When you suggest that native tribes are responsible for the placement of the Inscribed Stone ninety feet below ground, had also dug a mile-and-a-half long tunnel between Oak Island and Birch Island, and placed underwater doors on Birch Island, have you any evidence of such below ground work done anywhere else by the same native tribes? This would say you don't know much of North American Tribes, and the great migration flow of earlier times, and how First Nations are connected from Canada to Navaho's, though the athpaskan migration cycle, Navaho's through Mexican's, Mexicans through to Mayans, to Inca's...ect....to know that there has been wonders built throughout these times in history; it's really not hard to comprehend that it is possible. I mean earlier questions you were throwing possibilities in your questions....so lets just say it's not impossible to fathom. 6)Have you explained the difficulty of excavating a mile-and-a-half long tunnel completely underwater from Oak Island to Birch Island, the difficulty of getting fresh air to the miners, and where the spoils from such an excavation would have been placed? Do you understand the changes in the Mining Industry, and the history of it. Trust me they use to send Asians into tunnels way deeper than a mile without the thought of getting them fresh air. We have to put into context the time frame, and the way ppl would conduct business, back then it would have been more of a slave thing if it was to be built...so how much did they care for the ppl that made these tunnels. 7)If, as you suggest, that the Money Pit (where the Inscribed Stone was found) was never meant to go below the depth where the Stone was found (around ninety feet), then what was the purpose of the concrete vault some twenty feet further down containing oak and metal pieces, evidence of which was brought up by hand augur in the 1800s? I relate to this but if this was the case, in what chambers did he find these; I mean if I'm not mistaken it was a vault; a holding vault, maybe for men. Whenever you practice mining of any sort you need vaults at certian intervals, it doesn't prove nothing but they knew how to dig. 8)If, as you suggest, the ninety foot level was as far as the excavators meant to go, then why is there evidence of man-made activity below bedrock at two hundred feet, as evidenced by video and iron brought up from Borehole 10-X, some sixty feet distance from the Money Pit? As we all know these chambers were to be built underwater, and to know that if say it was to cave in, or burst at a certian point, would you not dig lets say another 100 ft of drainage to make sure what was being buried would be protected. 9)If, as you suggest, there was no need to go below ninety feet, then why were there (at least) two separate self-contained drainage systems leading into the Money Pit below the hundred foot level, whose terminus were false beaches lined with coconut fiber, material that is not native to Nova Scotia? Again as this is pratically the same question as number eight; I will use the number eight answer as it pertains to this closely similar question. 10)Since I just lost the last page and I don't want to lose what I wrote; it was in the context about a freemasonary; and there was no such thing as free masonary group since before 1717; I believe what the question said. Anywho to cut it short and descriptively-No one knows just how old Freemasonry is because the actual origins have been lost in time. Most scholars believe Masonry arose from the guilds of stonemasons who built the majestic castles and cathedrals of the middle ages. So as I leave you this to ponder; and maybe next tyme check it out before you decide to make an intrusion that deserves a little more thought. Thank you for your time; it was something else.
Respectfully Corey Desjarlais
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Mar 18, 2007 7:35:05 GMT -5
=== Ten Questions For Keith Ranville === 1. When you show your picture of Birch Island superimposed with the triangle of dots (similar to the stone triangle on Oak Island), have you made it clear there are no boulders or stones on Birch Island representing these positions? 2. When you claim that the "triangle" on Birch Island is man-made, have you made it clear that from aerial images, there are obvious indications of wetland features, such as streams, emergent vegetation (plants that exist in a partially wet-partially dry environment) and natural springs? 3. Have you addressed the fact that such plant growth as mentioned above exhibits extreme change over the short time interval of twenty to thirty years between when the black-and-white images were taken and when the color images were taken? 4. Have you considered the possibility that if such environmental change (like shifting shorelines, missing trees and drying wetlands) could occur in such a short timeframe (possibly as little as thirty years or so), how difficult it would be for a supposedly "man-made" feature to still be visible after three hundred and fifty years? 5. When you suggest that native tribes are responsible for the placement of the Inscribed Stone ninety feet below ground, had also dug a mile-and-a-half long tunnel between Oak Island and Birch Island, and placed underwater doors on Birch Island, have you any evidence of such below ground work done anywhere else by the same native tribes? 6. Have you explained the difficulty of excavating a mile-and-a-half long tunnel completely underwater from Oak Island to Birch Island, the difficulty of getting fresh air to the miners, and where the spoils from such an excavation would have been placed? 7. If, as you suggest, that the Money Pit (where the Inscribed Stone was found) was never meant to go below the depth where the Stone was found (around ninety feet), then what was the purpose of the concrete vault some twenty feet further down containing oak and metal pieces, evidence of which was brought up by hand augur in the 1800s? 8. If, as you suggest, the ninety foot level was as far as the excavators meant to go, then why is there evidence of man-made activity below bedrock at two hundred feet, as evidenced by video and iron brought up from Borehole 10-X, some sixty yards distance from the Money Pit? 9. If, as you suggest, there was no need to go below ninety feet, then why were there (at least) two separate self-contained drainage systems leading into the Money Pit below the hundred foot level, whose terminus were elaborate false beaches, and whose channels were lined with coconut fiber, a material that is not native to Nova Scotia? 10. When you claim that Francis Bacon was a Freemason, have you taken into account that there is no evidence of any English Masonic body before 1717, more than ninety years after Bacon passed away? There are a couple dozen more questions I'd love to have Keith answer. But as will soon be seen, whenever anyone brings up such inconvenient questions, pointing out the glaring holes in Keith's research, he responds with personal attacks, more spam press releases, or the current retort of choice, placing his fingers in his ears and yelling "Nyah nyah, can't hear you, you're on the ignore list!" Simple Questions more Questions will be Logically answered in my Documentary #1 the dots on the Birch Island triangle represents the Oak Island triangle? And the dividing line through it… to the left…and the dots on the BW photo is not saying if there are markers that are on Birch Island, other than the similarities triangle it’s self. www.mythandmystery.com/birch_island_triangle.htm #2 there is no proof that Birch Island is not man made, just speculated opinion …wait for documentary. #3 yes there looks to be change in the environment in the triangle that could be due to artificial change please wait for the for more information it will explained in the documentary. #4 yes check out the right angle of the triangle, there is s reseeding, and water level deepens at the beach area at the right angle of the triangle. #5 nobody really knows who is responsible for Oak Island that is why it is a mystery? #6 Right now I am focusing on the right angle of Birch Islands triangle. Not other tunnels. But that’s an option open to theorize. #7 the metal piece and debris ect. Was to form the money pit in depth? It would not be logical to make the bottom foundation of the money pit out of something precious.. #8 The stuff that was found deep in the money was debris same as #7.. The iron found in a neighboring hole to the money pit was a counter weight to expel the contents out of the money pit layer by layer, then the pit was refilled with logs and dirt this is why there was only junk found…in the pit. www.mythandmystery.com/oak_island_cross_section.gif #9 the ninety-foot layer is the last layer of dirt and logs. And below that, is the opening shaft tunnel to the artificial beach in smiths cove, the other opening is natural. The coconut husk was some kind of mortar or the oil from the husk may have been a lubricant to mix with the clay or a waterproof sealant of some sort. The coconut fibers may evidence there is south American connection.. #10 I am not going into if Francis Bacon was a freemason or not back in those days secret societies were kept secret and secrets are secret to these days even to the most respected scholars, and many of his writings are missing and were thought to be under the River Wye, I think they were removed like the Money pits contents, and put into a more secure place. i.e. ? Birch Island Any more questions should be directed to the producer’s of my documentary, contact information is explained in the press release Oak Island Story. Thank you, 1. Sincerely Original New Research: Oak Island Researcher/Treasure Hunter Keith Ranville oakislandmoneypitblogspotcom.blogspot.com/kr.mendhak.comwww.mythandmystery.com/sir_francis_bacon_oak_island_connection.htm www.treasurestories.losttreasurehunting.com/2007/02/13/oak-island-treasure-mystery-watermark-cipher/
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Mar 21, 2007 12:55:54 GMT -5
Beal
maybe selling your CD collection on this forum will solve this oak island mystery because it does not solve beals mystery?
|
|
|
Post by beale on Mar 24, 2007 18:21:17 GMT -5
oakster, I have deleted my last post to you. Here is I believe all our readers have to read about you and Oak Island Treasure: www.birchislandillusion.blogspot.com/Enough said on Oak Island and Birch Island!
|
|
oakster
Respected Member
Keith Ranville
Posts: 59
|
Post by oakster on Apr 15, 2007 3:38:39 GMT -5
|
|