mk1979
Respected Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by mk1979 on Jul 10, 2013 17:03:40 GMT -5
the secret too cipher 1 or 3 has just been figured out. i have been working on the beale cipher for months now and i found it and can prove it. i found a hidden code. it is not the key to 3 or 1 but its how you get the key. i just registered with this site becuz im just excited that i found this code. i WILL crack the beale cipher. i dont even care about the gold, well i do a little but theres no better feeling when u find a keycode hidden in a 200 year old cipher. 1 and 3 are not deciphered from a book or document. thats all i can say. i just want to leveryo.e know its not a hoax cuz the code i found took beale time to create and i dont think it was done for nothing
|
|
|
Post by beale on Jul 10, 2013 17:07:12 GMT -5
the secret too cipher 1 or 3 has just been figured out. i have been working on the beale cipher for months now and i found it and can prove it. i found a hidden code. it is not the key to 3 or 1 but its how you get the key. i just registered with this site becuz im just excited that i found this code. i WILL crack the beale cipher. i dont even care about the gold, well i do a little but theres no better feeling when u find a keycode hidden in a 200 year old cipher. 1 and 3 are not deciphered from a book or document. thats all i can say. i just want to leveryo.e know its not a hoax cuz the code i found took beale time to create and i dont think it was done for nothing That's great, I wish you the best of luck. You may be right on the hidden code of code of the DOI. I have long suspected this in my work on the codes. The strings in Code Paper 1 proves that whenever Beale figured out the hidden key he had the DOI lying in front of him to make the ciphers match what he wanted to say and at the same time create the alphabet strings. Again good luck and break the codes once and for all time.
|
|
mk1979
Respected Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by mk1979 on Jul 10, 2013 17:18:20 GMT -5
Just in case Simone found it which I haven't read about yet so I don't think no one has but what I'm asking is has anyone found another code in cipher 2? Anything besides the actual message? Cuz I did and want to know if I'm the only one
|
|
cat
Respected Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by cat on Jul 10, 2013 20:32:22 GMT -5
You may well be... ;D HH!
|
|
mk1979
Respected Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by mk1979 on Jul 15, 2013 22:42:03 GMT -5
I'm gonna show everyone what I have, I'm gonna make a YouTube video to show you the proof that this was made in the later 1800s, the first video I make will be explaining what I have and the second will explain how, in detail.
|
|
cat
Respected Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by cat on Jul 16, 2013 5:47:02 GMT -5
;D OK...
|
|
|
Post by beale on Jul 27, 2013 16:25:10 GMT -5
You do know that Peter Viemeister book about the Confederate Cover-up was fiction based on facts. That note by the old lady was made up by Peter--------I asked him about the note because the note gave the story a sort of reality but no it was made up according to Peter's own words.
|
|
cat
Respected Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by cat on Jul 28, 2013 16:25:09 GMT -5
ACTUALLY, it IS from the RAGLAND (Family) papers; an attorney descendant from ES Hutter still has VLoN, and supposedly has "documented" that "note" from 1929; RAGLAND Family Papers are STILL not available to the public, to my knowledge. It WASN'T Rugerman... (PV is correct); it is RAGLAND. STILL looking into it... FUN!
|
|
cat
Respected Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by cat on Jul 28, 2013 16:54:53 GMT -5
FURTHER INFO... "google" Descendants of Johann Ludwig Hutter, 1726. Look at # 20 & # 23; especially, # 23. Attorney HM Gibbs had the VLoN directly from ES Hutter... Newspaper article in RAGLAND possession (2004); WHEN did PV release his LAST book on the "BEALE"... CONFEDERATE TREASURY...? 2004! DUH! MORE later...
|
|
cat
Respected Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by cat on Jul 28, 2013 18:43:18 GMT -5
AND! Attorney Gibbs' father-in-law was MAJOR E.S. HUTTER!
|
|